There’s been a lot of active discussion about the state of AOL’s directory project, DMOZ. There have been many attempts to unseat the directory project from its position as the most authoritative listing resource, such as the Yahoo Directory. Many of these attempts have fallen by the wayside, as Rand Fiskin points out, but none have remained more controversial than DMOZ. More recently, Chris Crum’s post on WebProNews about his lack of respect for DMOZ has stirred up a hornet’s nest of DMOZ criticism, including a particular post claiming DMOZ is a waste of time.

I forwarded a lot of this on to Philip Nicolcev, known by username as “frug“, who is the editor of several roleplay-oriented categories on DMOZ. He responded to me directly with a highly insightful email, and I was fortunate enough to receive his permission to share its contents.

I’ve been editing the pbp category at DMOZ for what… 4 years now? About that. This article is a big whiny complaint which misses the mark. They are both correct and sadly mistaken.

Yes, dmoz is outdated and yes, it fails because of attitude problems, but not silly allegations of ‘corruption’ or people who are bitter because they didn’t get listed. We don’t list everything, I don’t list even half of the submissions I get, and anyone who has been an administrator or an editor for a similar type of project knows better than to take these kinds of complaints seriously.

One thing they say is definitely correct: Apply once carefully following their rules if you wish and then, as Will suggested, forget about them.

This is exactly the approach that should be modeled for any directory, regardless of its state or condition. When you are submitting a link to a directory, you are being offered the privilege to be listed as a resource by the owners and management of that directory. They are not obligated to list your link, let alone review it in a timely fashion–but this would be genuinely appreciated and would reflect on the directory’s position as a “good” resource.

DMOZ is the primary source for Google’s Directory, and you must respect the opinion of such a large and successful company. It’s obvious that the idea behind an open directory like DMOZ is good, but where they fail is in execution. More on that later.

He continues:

That is what you should do. Apply once and forget about it, don’t claim anybody is corrupt because whether you believe my opinion or not, there’s no corruption. Nobody cares enough about dmoz anymore for it to be valuable for extortion. Don’t be ridiculous. Furthermore if you were to speak to some of the senior editors you’d discover that they are pretty damn uptight, even obsessive.

The problems with dmoz are, in my opinion, twofold. First off, you have the dated trashy look of the website which is a relic of the 1990’s. It’s not user friendly, it doesn’t entice anyone to go browsing, and it hasn’t adapted or added features that would help people understand the structure of the directory or find what they’re looking for. The editor forums still use phpBB2, and you should see the editing panel. You wouldn’t believe how dated this stuff is. Frankly it has needed an overhaul for years now.

I largely agree with him. The phpBB team deprecated the phpBB2 branch at the beginning of this year, ending support for the outdated platform. AOL would do well to do a complete overhaul of the site’s design now that “Web 2.0″ has come and gone (and I could reference posts all day on that) - and AOL has completely missed their opportunity to latch on and ride the wave.

Philip finishes his correspondance with the frightening truth that has been plaguing many post-Web2.0 sites and services:

The second problem, attitude, is partially the cause of the first problem. It’s a stagnant atmosphere where nothing gets done and nobody gets listened to. They would rather leave a directory as a cluttered mess of garbage than risk breaking its structure by overhauling it. Fixing my category took me about two years before I had approval to restructure it, and I’m in a small niche category nobody pays much attention to. Since becoming an editor I have deleted about 60% of the outdated links listed. Had I not joined, they’d still be there cluttering things up with linkspam geocities pages from 10 years ago.

So yeah, dmoz is failing, but not because of corruption or because some guy didn’t get what he wanted. And, honestly, if the author of this article was applying to dmoz just to ‘test how fair it was’ then I’m glad they rejected him. Somehow they made the right decision because he’s wasting their time.

And that’s the exact problem - the DMOZ community has completely stagnated, which has resulted in the puddle of goop that the directory has become. In my personal opinion, I think that AOL could do a lot better job at community management (all reputation management aside) by setting up a more rigid structure of responsibility. The editors need to be held responsible for a timely review specified by their superiors, and there needs to be cross-checking of the editor’s work by other qualified editors.

Is this another example of AOL’s purchases being mismanaged and ultimately being forgotten, such as what many people claim is the case with ex-Nullsoft product WinAmp? Perhaps, but I think that remains to be seen. After all, even our favored Google took a questionable amount of time to convert phone-consolidation service GrandCentral to the new Google Voice after its 2007 acquisition. DMOZ was in fact originally a Netscape project, which then-strong AOL acquired in 1998. Since that acquisition, little has changed.

All said and done, DMOZ needs some love if it’s going to survive as anything more than a relic of trust and authority in the Web 2.0 bubble. As Philip points out, it has both good and bad traits and deserves further attention, but it needs to be attention in (and from) the right direction. The questions remain; where has AOL been? What can be done about the editors (or lack thereof)? How can DMOZ be improved?

I’ve been using Twitter since pretty early on (and long before @oprah), and I’ve found it to be a superbly convenient communication tool and notification service. Even though it’s still very young on the web (Twitter was founded in March of 2006) It’s been the home to great ideas like the #twitterdata proposal and the publicdomain book-via-tweets project. It’s also an awesome reputation management platform, and can be used to both to provide effective customer service and help distribute news and updates about your business or product, which is exactly how I use it for my online roleplaying project.

But as with the rest of the social media world, Twitter can become very complex very quickly (but I still contend that there is no social media overload) and as a result, can be difficult to manage. As a result, I use several third-party tools to help me manage and gather information that helps me do my Twitter job much more efficiently and effectively.

Splitweet

Splitweet allows you to post and monitor multiple Twitter accounts and brands.

For those of us with multiple Twitter accounts (like some people who create a Twitter account for each roleplaying character they use), Splitweet is an absolute savior. This service allows you to tweet to multiple accounts at the same time, as well as combining the “stream” from each account into one page. A lot of desktop Twitter clients offer this kind of functionality, but where Splitweet truly excels is in its ability to track what it calls “brands” (more reputation management terms here): you can specify keywords and phrases that will appear in a separate feed, even if you do not follow those users. This gets us around the disastrous changes Twitter made to the @replies, and helps us keep up to date on any mentions of our site’s name and any tweets relating to what it is that we do.

Sherflock

Sherflock provides detailed statistics and summaries of Twitter users you are associated with.

Sherflock is an absolutely awesome stat tracking machine that helps weed out the waves of spam that have been coming in since Twitter has gone mainstream. Sherflock gives a large number of statistics about each every account the either follows you or that you are following, and lets you sort and filter users based on these statistics.

Twitterfall

Twitterfall offers a live stream of twitter updates on keywords that you specify.

This tool allows you to specify any number of keywords that you wish to view on a live, moving stream of tweets. This is very useful if you are using a computer that allows you to “pin” a window on top (like Ubuntu Linux), or if you have a multiple-monitor rig, or even if you use multiple computers using the input-sharing app Synergy. You’ll get a live feed of updates on any topic of your choice, which can even be updated and changed in real-time.

Using these three tools will help you maximize you Twitter performance and make the most of an already awesome service, preventing you from being inundated with the massive stream of messages that you’re surely going to subscribe to.

What are your top three Twitter tools? Feel free to make a comment or write your own post, and I’ll gladly append a link to this post to help everyone out!

There’s a large number of Content Management System, Bulletin Board, and Blog solutions available, all with amazing functionality that simply can’t be missed on today’s rapidly advancing internet(s).

Examples
CMS: Joomla, with around 280,000 lines of code.
BB: phpBB, with around 150,000 lines of code.
Blogs: WordPress, with around 170,000 lines of code.

My challenge is this:
What is the smallest full-featured CMS, BB, or Blog that you can create?

Contest submissions must include the following features:

• User Accounts
• Article Posts (or “Topics” in BB-land)
• Comment System

Submissions will be accepted in any language, so long as the content can be served up over HTTP. To submit, comment on this post with a link to your project!

Good luck and happy coding!

Between work, my social life, and training, I play a game called EVE Online. It’s the first game I’ve ever shelled out a monthly fee for, and it’s well worth it. I came across this fan-made video for one of the in-game factions on CrazyKinux’s blog.

Full screen this and play it in HD, while keeping in mind that this is made entirely of recorded gameplay video.

I’m the director of a group of players (called a “Corporation” as opposed to “Guild” in other MMORPGs), and if you’re interested in playing with me, shoot me a line or message me in game as “Baeryn”. You’ll never find a game so perfect.

In liturgical Islam texts, we are called Masihi (مسيحي), or “Followers of the Messiah”. In Chinese, we are 基督徒 - a literal “Christ follower”. Regardless of what you call us, I feel that who is defined as a “Christian” has deviated far from what has been laid out by Christ and his closest disciples.

On a daily basis, I am faced with the bitter disgust incited by the dogma surrounding the “Christian” faith. A growing number of intellectuals shun Christianity as a result of its hypocrisy; all too common is the known Christian who is seen lying, cheating, stealing, or otherwise sinning–directly in opposition to the perception of the Church to be wholly condescending upon sinners and their deeds. The view of Christian doctrine that enforces a “fire and brimstone” doom upon those who do not repent from their sinful ways is one that is misunderstood and misinterpreted, turning people away from the true nature of Christianity before a full understanding is given.

In 1st John, John writes (and I promise to keep my number of Bible references to a minimum):

If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.
1st John 1:8

It is the very nature of the Christian faith to recognize that we sin: this is the whole premise of following the figure that our faith is named after. We are sinners, and we do participate in activities and perform activities that are duly defiant of the damnation that is preached from some pulpits. It is our aspiration to emulate the figurehead by admitting our sins and providing unconditional love to everyone and everything we come into contact with that is supposed to set us apart from nonbelievers.

However, it is unfortunate that most “Christians” have lost sight of our true nature (that is, to love and care for all of God’s creation) and are not the loving and caring role models that our faith demands. John continues in chapter 4:

⁷Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. ⁸Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. ⁹This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. ¹⁰This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins. ¹¹Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. ¹²No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.
1st John 4:7-12

As the passage exemplifies, God is embodied in our capacity to love; it is the command of love that we must maintain first and foremost. If we do not have love, we have nothing. (See “All You Need Is Love“)

I fully agree with the perception that Christians today are too righteous: we are commanded to be humble. It is for this reason, among others, that I most frequently choose to be called (…) a “follower of Christ” as opposed to a “Christian” (which ironically enough, was used as a condemning phrase). Christians have no right to tout their holiness as a indicator of superiority over anyone.

We must love everyone; Muslims, Jews, the poor, the sick, the needy… people of all races, faiths, nationalities and conditions; all are included in the Christian’s domain of unconditional love and tolerance, no matter what their actions. As the great Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said:

Let freedom ring. And when this happens, and when we allow freedom ring—when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children—black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics—will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual: “Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”